|
From: | green h |
Subject: | Re: [Fsuk-manchester] Freelance user support |
Date: | Mon, 07 Jul 2014 01:26:04 +0100 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 |
Hi All, Some years ago I set up a social enterprise to provide 2nd user PCs and laptops running Linux with installation and support. The idea was that the 'model' for the business might be adopted and adapted by any one who was interested and had the skills or wanted to learn them so they would be able to earn a living out of it. I gave a talk about it at a Manchester free software meeting at the time. I'd be happy to share my experiences with anyone who's interested in picking this up and running with it. Cheers, Des On 06/07/14 21:29, Quiliro Ordóñez Baca
wrote:
El dom 06 jul 2014 10:27:27 ECT, peter green escribió:Quiliro Ordóñez Baca wrote:Sounds like a cool marketing strategy. I think it is very important to recognize freedom too in the marketing because people often forget it and think that the reason to change to free software is for short lasting motivations.There are many reasons people use free software, some use it because they belive propietary software is unethical, some use it because of the price, some use it because they are fed up with tracking installation counts for software licensing. Some use it because it's the best tool for the job. Some use it because they don't want to be tied to a single vendor for bugfixes. Some use it because they want to be able to customise the software to fit their own needs. I think you should bear in mind that your clients reasons may not be the same as yours.That is precisely what I am saying and to promote the fact that the motivations to move to free software which involve freedom are long lasting.Also, mentioning freedom centers quality around it instead of temporary functionality in lieu of freedom. This saves the business from installing non-free drivers of firmware in favour of raising the user's freedom.I don't think one should conflate drivers and firmware. I also don't think one should let perfect be the enemy of good.Well then what is the problem with using Microsoft? It has a lot of "open source" software which ignores the objective is freedom. With a partially free system there is not freedom. That does not mean there cannot be a gradual migration. I did it myself. I started giving support to a mix of free and non-free software. Now I only work with free software. The migration from some free software to nearly all freedom was difficult. (No one has total freedom yet...there is non-free hardware, bios and SaaSS.) Nevertheless, it is much better to do it directly to freedom. You get used to working with new non-free parts and that makes it hard to migrate.In an ideal world firmware would be free software too but in many cases the actual choice is between propietary firmware stored in the hardware and propietary firmware loaded from disk. I fail to see how the user is any more free with the former than the latter.It is a step forward. The latter has already been surmounted. So there is no need to take steps backward.I would try to avoid any hardware that required propietary kernel mode drivers because they are likely to limit my freedom to upgrade the kernel in future.Cool. That is the way.OTOH if the choices for meeting the customers requirements are a free OS with a handful of non-free drivers or a completely non-free stack I think a free software advocate would be mad to push someone towards the latter by refusing to implement the former.It is always easier to be a double agent. Being loyal to freedom is not for everyone....It takes a lot of guts and putting juicy some benefits aside. Playing the double agent role will bite you in the end because it makes you compromise values. I appreciate your opinion. Please do not think I disrespect it. Although I do not share your position, I can respect it because all opinions come from the respective person's prior experiences. -- Saludos libres, Quiliro Ordóñez 600 8579 |
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |