fsuk-manchester
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Fsuk-manchester] Trisqel, Debian, and non-free fir mware (was: Any


From: Bob Ham
Subject: Re: [Fsuk-manchester] Trisqel, Debian, and non-free fir mware (was: Any folks in Manchester interested in p articipating in an Ubuntu Global Jam event if I were to organise one?)
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 17:03:52 +0000
User-agent: Roundcube Webmail/0.7.1

On 2013-02-20 16:03, Simon Ward wrote:
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 02:15:30PM +0000, MJ Ray wrote:
> If an installer does not offer the possibility of installing some
> non-free firmware, is it "concealing" that non-free firmware from the
> user?  Or is it respecting the user's desire to not be offered an
> invitation to the choking world of proprietary software?

Nice straw man.  Debian's installer has to have a firmware loader
anyway (some firmware is free software) and so any fully-working
installer must "offer the possibility" else it would not be free
software.  Some makes it harder than others.

Free software firmware could be provided on the installation media or in
the repository, and does not need to load it from elsewhere.

I think this is getting very far from the point. The word "concealing" implies some kind of deceit on the part of the distribution maker, as though they are doing something bad.

However, this view depends on the user *wanting* to be subjected to questions about installing non-free firmware. I'm pointing out the fact that this is an assumption; there are users who definitely do *not* want to be subjected to such questions.


The issue then comes down to what the distribution maker intends to provide; a free software operating system, or an operating system that subjects users to questions about non-free firmware. If the intent is to provide a free software operating system then omitting an offer to install non-free firmware isn't "concealing" anything, it's respecting the user's wishes.

I'm not completely sure what the intention is within the Debian community on this particular point. I could be wrong but I actually get the impression that the Debian community itself isn't completely sure what the intention is within the Debian community.


--
Bob Ham <address@hidden>

for (;;) { ++pancakes; }



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]