fsuk-manchester
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Fsuk-manchester] [FSFE-Manc] Software Freedom Day: Hunt for Skype a


From: Daniel Pocock
Subject: Re: [Fsuk-manchester] [FSFE-Manc] Software Freedom Day: Hunt for Skype alternatives
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 14:19:20 +0100
User-agent: K-9 Mail for Android


If you ask on the Jitsi users list they may be able to give you a TURN server name and credentials you can test against (to fix the ICE error) and if that works, it would not be too hard to set up a local TURN server on the same box running the Jabber server.

Many of the commercial products come preconfigured to use their own relay servers, so you don't normally see these details. Future versions of Jitsi and Lumicall are likely to have stronger abilities to discover such things automatically.



Anna Morris <say.hello.toaddress@hidden> wrote:
hum, well I am sure sam and I will try that at some point with the fsfe server and see how we go - I am aware vaguely as to why this is so difficult, but at the same time, I don’t see how cisco have managed to do it as it sounds like the same thing. I always figured it was simply the use of a shared server/group of servers that made it work - but it seems not.

Anna

On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 12:50 PM, Steffi Tinder <address@hidden> wrote:
Hi!


Anna, can you try using Jitsi with the same Jabber server and let us
know if it works?

I have tried that and I couldn't get it working :( The error was something like "Could not establish connection (ICE failed)". We used different combinations of servers and protocols and we definitely tried with both using the same server (gmail in that case).

Hope that helps,

Stefanie


Anna Morris <say.hello.to <http://say.hello.to>.anna@googlemail.com> wrote:

    am interested as to why jabber, through pidgin, with both accounts
    on same server, worked when we were in the same room but not when we
    were in different places. Cisco are offering something jabber shaped
    as a service like this, and apparantly that works (i bet they wont
    tell us how or why though!). I really wouldn't mind paying a few
    pounds a month for a service like this, but not from them. Anyway -
    it is all over my head, but i guess all the info helps :)



    On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 8:32 AM, Matthias Kirschner <address@hidden
    <mailto:address@hidden>> wrote:

        * Daniel Pocock <address@hidden
        <mailto:address@hidden>> [2013-01-29 21:01:24 +0100]:


         > In particular, we are expecting a really big attendance at
        the session
         > this Sunday.  My web stats have gone through the roof this
        month, and
         > all of the speakers involved typically attract a huge crowd just
         > appearing on their own.  Is there anybody involved with FSFE
        who may
         > be able to comment on or contribute to the logistics of carrying
         > forward the momentum from Sunday's session?

        I will be at FOSDEM, what are your plans? I am not sure I can attend
        your session, but I heard from others from FSFE that they plan to.

        Cheers,
        Matthias

        --
        Matthias Kirschner - FSFE - Fellowship Coordinator, German
        Coordinator
        FSFE, Linienstr. 141, 10115 Berlin, t +49-30-27595290
        <tel:%2B49-30-27595290> +49-1577-1780003 <tel:%2B49-1577-1780003>
        Weblog (blogs.fsfe.org/mk <http://blogs.fsfe.org/mk>) - Contact
        (fsfe.org/about/kirschner <http://fsfe.org/about/kirschner>)

        Support FSFE! http://fsfe.org/support/?mk
        _______________________________________________
        Manchester mailing list
        address@hidden <mailto:address@hiddenorg>
        https://lists.fsfe.org/mailman/listinfo/manchester






_______________________________________________
Fsuk-manchester mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/fsuk-manchester





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]