[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Fsuk-manchester] Misunderstanding the Free Software Philosophy
From: |
Jacek Podkanski |
Subject: |
Re: [Fsuk-manchester] Misunderstanding the Free Software Philosophy |
Date: |
Sun, 06 Jan 2013 21:47:09 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 |
Quote from: http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.html
I have capitalised some words for emphasis.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The two terms describe ALMOST THE same category of software, but they
stand for views based on fundamentally different values.
Open source is a DEVELOPMENT METHODOLOGY; free software is a SOCIAL
MOVEMENT.
For the free software movement, free software is an ETHICAL IMPERATIVE,
essential respect for the users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of
open source considers issues in terms of how to make software
“better”—in A PRACTICAL SENSE ONLY.
It says that nonfree software is an inferior solution to the PRACTICAL
PROBLEM at hand. For the free software movement, however, nonfree
software is a SOCIAL PROBLEM,
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The controversy of Free Software is almost becoming a religious
argument. http://www.biblegateway.com/verse/en/2%20Timothy%202:14
The more I read about it, the more it seems to me that Open Source
Methodology and Free Software Movement are two inseparable sides of the
same coin. You can't solve the social problems without solving the
practical problems.
In RMS' own words:
open source..............................free software
development methodology.......social movement
practical....................................ethical
practical....................................social
Jacek
On 06/01/13 19:31, Michael Dorrington wrote:
On 06/01/13 02:00, Jacek Podkanski wrote:
I have a feeling that there was free software before RMS started the
free software movement and I think there's no need to give in to
pressure of one free software group who wants to keep the name for
themselves. There must be better way of solving this.
Perhaps Open Source is what you are looking for?
But I would urge you to think about the freedom aspect of software.
http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.html
Mike.
_______________________________________________
Fsuk-manchester mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/fsuk-manchester