On 26/06/2008, Michael Dorrington <address@hidden> wrote:
Tim Dobson wrote:
Therefore is it absolutely necessary to mention GNU/Linux in the mission
statement? In my opinion, it probably isn't -I don't proposing ignoring
GNU/Linux by any menns but I don't think we should favour it over
GNU/OpenSolaris, GNU/BSD or even vanilla BSD or vanilla OpenSolaris or any
other free software operating system.
Manchester *free software* group
It's all in the name.
--
try not to be too abusive when you disagree with me ;) :)
Luckily for you, I agree! ;)
The GNU/Linux bit did seem to grate a bit to me when I was reading it. And
the statement doesn't mention copyleft
<http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/copyleft.html> software.
Perhaps the GNU/Linux part was meant elude to that? So what about this
Hmm, I think I disagree :)
Awareness of Linux is growing and a lot of more experienced computer
users have probably heard of the name, whereas copyleft is something
that even a lot of experienced GNU/Linux users have not heard of.
We are different from a (G)LUG because of the emphasis on free
software rather than GNU/Linux and I think/hope that the mission
statement shows that.
But to decrease the emphasis on GNU/Linux a bit, how about:
Manchester Free Software serves a growing need for a group in the
Manchester area that focuses on free software, including GNU/Linux.
The group also covers topics which impact on the freedoms of computer
users, such as Digital Restrictions Management.