[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Fsuk-manchester] Ubuntu !free
From: |
Simon Ward |
Subject: |
Re: [Fsuk-manchester] Ubuntu !free |
Date: |
Thu, 22 May 2008 11:05:03 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14) |
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 10:45:14AM +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
> > I see no compelling ethical or societal reasons why a company should be
> > obligated to share the source code for it's in-house software systems.
> [...]
>
> Not obligated (I feel that's a straw man I never introduced - I've
> written in the past about the absurdity of trying to force
> cooperation), but it is better if they are shared, isn't it?
I’d wager a good proportion of free software was written to satisfy
personal niggles and could have been kep private had the authors not
been inclined to share.
Simon
--
A complex system that works is invariably found to have evolved from a
simple system that works.—John Gall
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- Re: [Fsuk-manchester] Infopoint, (continued)
- Re: [Fsuk-manchester] Infopoint, Paul Waring, 2008/05/07
- Re: [Fsuk-manchester] Ubuntu !free, Dave Crossland, 2008/05/21
- Re: [Fsuk-manchester] Ubuntu !free, Noah Slater, 2008/05/21
- Re: [Fsuk-manchester] Ubuntu !free, MJ Ray, 2008/05/21
- Re: [Fsuk-manchester] Ubuntu !free, Dave Crossland, 2008/05/21
- Re: [Fsuk-manchester] Ubuntu !free, MJ Ray, 2008/05/22
- Re: [Fsuk-manchester] Ubuntu !free, Dave Crossland, 2008/05/22
- Re: [Fsuk-manchester] Ubuntu !free,
Simon Ward <=
- Re: [Fsuk-manchester] Ubuntu !free, Noah Slater, 2008/05/22
- Re: [Fsuk-manchester] Ubuntu !free, Simon Ward, 2008/05/22
- Re: [Fsuk-manchester] Ubuntu !free, Noah Slater, 2008/05/21
- Re: [Fsuk-manchester] Ubuntu !free, Dave Crossland, 2008/05/21
- Re: [Fsuk-manchester] Ubuntu !free, Noah Slater, 2008/05/21
- Re: [Fsuk-manchester] Ubuntu !free, Dave Crossland, 2008/05/21
- Re: [Fsuk-manchester] Ubuntu !free, Noah Slater, 2008/05/22