[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Fsuk-manchester] Time for Actions
From: |
Simon Ward |
Subject: |
Re: [Fsuk-manchester] Time for Actions |
Date: |
Tue, 25 Mar 2008 19:59:57 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14) |
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 07:12:58PM +0000, Andy Halsall wrote:
> Not at all, The only reason I would suggest using the fsuk.org domain is
> consistency and control (assuming we have any). From an organisational
> standpoint it also gives one degree of separation from the FSF, but then as
> the facility is there I see no inherent problem in using it.
As you may gather from my previous posts, I don’t think we should aim
for separation from the FSF, but that may be just me. At the meeting,
my perception, and what I wrote down, was there was a musing that we
might want to avoid some actions that people consider petty. Nothing
concrete came of that.
Why is separation from the FSF such a strong concern?
Simon
PS. I’m on the list, no need to CC me.
--
A complex system that works is invariably found to have evolved from a
simple system that works.
— John Gaule
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- [Fsuk-manchester] Time for Actions, Tim Dobson, 2008/03/25
- Re: [Fsuk-manchester] Time for Actions, Simon Ward, 2008/03/25
- Re: [Fsuk-manchester] Time for Actions, Andy Halsall, 2008/03/25
- Re: [Fsuk-manchester] Time for Actions, Simon Ward, 2008/03/25
- Re: [Fsuk-manchester] Time for Actions, Andy Halsall, 2008/03/25
- Re: [Fsuk-manchester] Time for Actions,
Simon Ward <=
- Re: [Fsuk-manchester] Time for Actions, Andy Halsall, 2008/03/25
- Re: [Fsuk-manchester] Time for Actions, Simon Ward, 2008/03/25
- Re: [Fsuk-manchester] Time for Actions, Andy Halsall, 2008/03/25
- Re: [Fsuk-manchester] Time for Actions, Simon Ward, 2008/03/26
- Re: [Fsuk-manchester] Time for Actions, Paul Waring, 2008/03/26
- Re: [Fsuk-manchester] Time for Actions, Iain Roberts, 2008/03/27
Re: [Fsuk-manchester] Time for Actions, Simon Ward, 2008/03/25