Re: [Fsuk-manchester] Future Meetings

[Tim Dobson]

Simon Ward wrote:
> This has already become an FSF vs FSFE thing, and it shouldn’t be.  This
> is likely why those inter-organisational relations became sticking
> points.

To avoid problems like this, I really really think it would be best to 
be autonomous of both Organisations and embrace them both equally.

I don't think it is really going to be felt fair by the two obvious 
groups that one group takes precedence over the other and so I think 
friendly compromise is the best options, especially because in moral 
terms, both organisations are equal.

I don't think anyone who is debating from one point of view on 
fsuk-manchester mailing list is likely to be suddenly brought over to a 
different side by the comment of someone from the other side.
I think it is important for half the people to be materially unhappy 
with the ideas (or organisation) behind FSUK, and so I suggest that 
having "two big brothers" might be better conceived and less 
controversial while having minimal affect on how the group(s) actually 
function.

--
www.blog.tdobson.net
----
If each of us have one object, and we exchange them, then each of us
still has one object.
If each of us have one idea, and we exchange them, then each of us now
has two ideas.   -  George Bernard Shaw