Re: [Fsuk-manchester] Video of the FSUK talk from the 19th February

[Tim Dobson]

Andy Halsall wrote:
> On Thursday 28 February 2008 21:17:11 MJ Ray wrote:
> > No Problem Bugroff license is at http://tunes.org/legalese/bugroff.html
>>
> With those licenses the work could be taken and incorporated into a larger 
> work published under a non-free license.

Would the way to resolve this be to licence/relicence/dual-licence under 
the Free Art Licence, which is a commercially friendly, copyleft licence 
which takes the values of the GPL and applies them to things that aren't 
software.

http://artlibre.org/licence/lal/en/

The FSF endorses this licence for cultural works.

(though I think perhaps we should be GDFL'ing these talks? - probably 
not but just a suggestion)

--
www.dobo.urandom.co.uk
----
If each of us have one object, and we exchange them, then each of us
still has one object.
If each of us have one idea, and we exchange them, then each of us now
has two ideas.   -  George Bernard Shaw