[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Fsfe-uk] BECTA discriminate against FLOSS?
From: |
Brian Gough |
Subject: |
Re: [Fsfe-uk] BECTA discriminate against FLOSS? |
Date: |
Mon, 5 Jan 2004 12:09:44 +0000 |
Chris Croughton writes:
> It's pretty clear that they see Fedora as a 'lesser' system for
> 'developers' and other techie types, but they'll happily accept anything
> that community come up with back into their commercial product.
I feel I should point out that Red Hat employ many of the best
developers, license all their software under the GPL and license their
patents for use in free software. So their practical contributions to
free software are really quite substantial.
regards
--
Brian Gough
- Re: VB was Re: [Fsfe-uk] BECTA discriminate against FLOSS?, (continued)
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] BECTA discriminate against FLOSS?, Ramanan Selvaratnam, 2004/01/03
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] BECTA discriminate against FLOSS?, Chris Croughton, 2004/01/03
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] BECTA discriminate against FLOSS?, Ramanan Selvaratnam, 2004/01/03
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] BECTA discriminate against FLOSS?, Chris Croughton, 2004/01/04
- Free software & commercialisation (was: Re: [Fsfe-uk] BECTA discriminate against FLOSS?), Alex Hudson, 2004/01/04
- Re: Free software & commercialisation (was: Re: [Fsfe-uk] BECTA discriminate against FLOSS?), ian, 2004/01/04
- Re: Free software & commercialisation (was: Re: [Fsfe-uk] BECTA discriminate against FLOSS?), Ramanan Selvaratnam, 2004/01/19
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] BECTA discriminate against FLOSS?,
Brian Gough <=
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] BECTA discriminate against FLOSS?, Neil Darlow, 2004/01/05
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] BECTA discriminate against FLOSS?, Philip Hunt, 2004/01/04
Re: [Fsfe-uk] BECTA discriminate against FLOSS?, Paul Tansom, 2004/01/03
Re: [Fsfe-uk] BECTA discriminate against FLOSS?, ian, 2004/01/03