[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Fsfe-uk] Clarification needed
From: |
Alex Hudson |
Subject: |
Re: [Fsfe-uk] Clarification needed |
Date: |
25 Mar 2002 18:37:21 +0000 |
On Mon, 2002-03-25 at 17:41, John Dean wrote:
> The reason I asked is because we at theKompany support the Open Source
> model but we have dumped the GPL, much to the annoyance of RMS. After all
> we all have to eat.
Without wanting to start a flamewar, I thought most Kompany software was
produced under a proprietary, non-open-source licence? (theKompany EULA,
or whatever you call it).
Cheers,
Alex.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [Fsfe-uk] Clarification needed, hobbit, 2002/03/25
Re: [Fsfe-uk] Clarification needed, John Dean, 2002/03/25
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] Clarification needed,
Alex Hudson <=
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] Clarification needed, John Dean, 2002/03/25
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] Clarification needed, Alex Hudson, 2002/03/25
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] Clarification needed, MJ Ray, 2002/03/25
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] Clarification needed, John Dean, 2002/03/26
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] Clarification needed, Alex Hudson, 2002/03/26
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] Clarification needed, Andrew Savory, 2002/03/26
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] Clarification needed, MJ Ray, 2002/03/26
Re: [Fsfe-uk] Clarification needed, John Dean, 2002/03/26
Re: [Fsfe-uk] Clarification needed, MJ Ray, 2002/03/26
Re: [Fsfe-uk] Clarification needed, John Dean, 2002/03/26