Re: [Fsfe-france] RE: RE: Déformation de vos propos dans l'interview du Journal du Net

[jeremie ZIMMERMANN]

j'étais sûr que c'était de lui qu'il parlait!! (c'est Caron avec un seul R)

son texte est un tissu d'erreurs, le bonhomme n'y connait rien en logiciels et 
encore moins en libre... et cerise sur le gâteau il aurait été payé par une 
entreprise que nous n'apprécions pas des masses pour une étude sur le brevet 
logiciel...... 


jz


Le Jeudi 25 Novembre 2004 16:11, Paul Van den Bulck a écrit :
> Réponse rapide :
> 
> Voy. notamment Christophe Carron, Prof paris XII : "Les licences de 
logiciels dits libres à l'épreuve du droit  d'auteur français", Dalloz, 2003, 
chron, 1556.
> 
> Bien à vous 
> 
> Paul Van den Bulck
> > Avocat - Advocaat- Attorney at law
> Chargé d'enseignement à l'Université R. Schuman (Strasbourg)
> 
> 
> ULYS
> Avenue de la Couronne 224
> 1050 Brussels
> Belgium
> tel. +32 (0)2 340 88 10
> fax +32 (0)2 345 35 80
> address@hidden
> http://www.ulys.net 
> 
> Ulys is certified ISO 9001 : version 2000
> 
> Member of EUROJURIS - www.eurojuris.net
> International Network of Law Firms
> 
> 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This electronic message transmission contains information which may be 
confidential or privileged. The information is intended to be for the use of 
the individual or entity named above.  If you are not the intended 
recipient,be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the 
contents of this information is prohibited.  If you have received this 
electronic transmission in error, please notify us by telephone or by 
electronic mail immediately.
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Loic Dachary [mailto:address@hidden
> Sent: jeudi 25 novembre 2004 15:10
> To: Paul Van den Bulck
> Cc: address@hidden; Fabrice Deblock (E-mail)
> Subject: Re: RE: Déformation de vos propos dans l'interview du Journal
> du Net 
> 
> 
> Paul Van den Bulck writes:
>  > Je vous remercie pour votre mail. Les propos relatés par Mr Deblock
>  > sont corrects.  En réalité je fais référence à l'article 2 de la
>  > convention GPL.  
> 
>       Je suis troublé et je ne comprends plus. Voulez-vous dire que
> l'article 2 de la GNU GPL contient une aberration juridique ?
> Pouvez-vous m'indiquer, dans l'article 2 ci dessous, ce qui relève
> selon vous de l'aberration juridique ? A ma connaissance il ne se
> trouve pas aujourd'hui de juriste pour défendre cela, mais je peux me
> tromper. Si c'est le cas je vous remercie de me fournir les références
> précises de l'article ou de l'ouvrage afin que je puisse lire leur
> argumentation.
> 
>       Merci par avance,
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>   2. You may modify your copy or copies of the Program or any portion
> of it, thus forming a work based on the Program, and copy and
> distribute such modifications or work under the terms of Section 1
> above, provided that you also meet all of these conditions:
> 
>     a) You must cause the modified files to carry prominent notices
>     stating that you changed the files and the date of any change.
> 
>     b) You must cause any work that you distribute or publish, that in
>     whole or in part contains or is derived from the Program or any
>     part thereof, to be licensed as a whole at no charge to all third
>     parties under the terms of this License.
> 
>     c) If the modified program normally reads commands interactively
>     when run, you must cause it, when started running for such
>     interactive use in the most ordinary way, to print or display an
>     announcement including an appropriate copyright notice and a
>     notice that there is no warranty (or else, saying that you provide
>     a warranty) and that users may redistribute the program under
>     these conditions, and telling the user how to view a copy of this
>     License.  (Exception: if the Program itself is interactive but
>     does not normally print such an announcement, your work based on
>     the Program is not required to print an announcement.)
> 
> These requirements apply to the modified work as a whole.  If
> identifiable sections of that work are not derived from the Program,
> and can be reasonably considered independent and separate works in
> themselves, then this License, and its terms, do not apply to those
> sections when you distribute them as separate works.  But when you
> distribute the same sections as part of a whole which is a work based
> on the Program, the distribution of the whole must be on the terms of
> this License, whose permissions for other licensees extend to the
> entire whole, and thus to each and every part regardless of who wrote it.
> 
> Thus, it is not the intent of this section to claim rights or contest
> your rights to work written entirely by you; rather, the intent is to
> exercise the right to control the distribution of derivative or
> collective works based on the Program.
> 
> In addition, mere aggregation of another work not based on the Program
> with the Program (or with a work based on the Program) on a volume of
> a storage or distribution medium does not bring the other work under
> the scope of this License.
> 
> -- 
> Donate to FSF France online : http://rate.affero.net/fsffrance/
> Loic Dachary, 12 bd Magenta, 75010 Paris. Tel: 33 1 42 45 07 97      
> http://www.fsffrance.org/   http://www.dachary.org/loic/gpg.txt
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Liste de discussion FSF France.
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/fsfe-france
> 

-- 

**  Jeremie ZIMMERMANN  * * *  http://tofz.org  **
**  get my GNUPG/PGP public key at http://tofz.org/pubkey.asc **

pgpa7GDbB5riD.pgp
Description: PGP signature