Re: [ft-devel] An analysis of Librsvg

[Vincent Torri]

On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 10:43 AM <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> > what annoys me with resvg is that another compiler is needed. I guess that
> for
> > unix, there is no problem with package managers, as resvg is is already
> > compiled. For (native) Windows, i will be a bit more complicated
>
> I was thinking about that as well but what about using a different renderer
> for Windows?  _If_ resvg turns out to be `the perfect' solution for Linux
> that's a big big step.  Then, finding something else that's probably equally
> perfect for Windows might be a better solution altogether than having one
> thing that works `meh' across all platforms?  That's also the core idea
> about FT's modularity.

as I have said, in our project, we parse ourselves the svg and use
freetype renderer directly for the rendering. we do not depend on any
external library

Vincent Torri