[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Freeipmi-devel] Re: ipmi-dcmi testing results
From: |
Al Chu |
Subject: |
[Freeipmi-devel] Re: ipmi-dcmi testing results |
Date: |
Mon, 14 Dec 2009 15:50:44 -0800 |
Hey Holger,
On Mon, 2009-12-14 at 17:01 +0100, Liebig, Holger wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> here are some very first results and patch proposals from testing the
> ipmi-dcmi commands from freeipmi 0.8.1 (thanks for adding dcmi support
> into freeipmi).
>
> --get-asset-tag:
> Assumes asset tag to be multiple of 16bytes (max read size specified in DCMI
> spec).
Yup, that seems to be a bug.
> Also assumes, that there is an additional length/encoding information
> present (1st byte) as in the raw FRU information - which is not
> specified in the DCMI spec. Please note, that the direct reference to
> the FRU Product Data Spec. has been removed in Errata/Clarification
> E18 of the DCMI Spec. 1.0 Revision 1.0.
> Basically, the asset tag can be stored somewhere else in the BMC and
> only needs to be retrievable via IPMI command (it's interesting that
> no set command is not specified).
Ahhh. Ok. The wording of the spec suggested that it returned the
asset-tag field of the FRU, but instead it's just english. Now that you
mention it, it seems so obvious and I'm not sure why I read it that way
to begin with.
> --get-power-limit:
> The exception action is not a bit field and OEM actions are only defined for
> values 0x02 ... 0x10.
Thanks. I actually had a note in my printed copy of the spec with a
question mark next to it b/c I couldn't tell if it was values or
bitmasks. I obviously guessed wrong :-)
> --get-system-power-statistics:
> Stops after asking for 'power_measurement' instead of
> 'power_reading_state.power_measurement'.
>
> --get-enhanced-system-power-statistics:
> The template is slightly incorrect (it asks for a fixed/required number of
> 2048 required rolling average time periods in the response).
>
> --get-sensor-info:
> The number of parsed instances is not incremented, therefore the code loops
> forever.
>
> --activate-deactivate-power-limit:
> currently core dumps in argp_parse().
Yup, looks like these are all bugs. Thanks for the catches.
Thanks for the patch. I'll roll it in, w/ some tweaks (no need to keep
my old code commented out since they're just wrong).
Al
> Thanks
> Holger
>
> --
> Holger L i e b i g
> address@hidden Fujitsu Technology Solutions GmbH
> Senior Developer Otto Hahn Ring 6
> TSP x86 E SW 4 81739 Munich
> Telephone: +49 89 636 43820 GERMANY
> Telefax : +49 89 636 41215
> Internet http://*ts.fujitsu.com
> Company Details http://*de.ts.fujitsu.com/imprint.html
>
--
Albert Chu
address@hidden
Computer Scientist
High Performance Systems Division
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
- [Freeipmi-devel] Patch proposal for 0.8.1 to compile and work outofband under cygwin, Liebig, Holger, 2009/12/11
- Re: [Freeipmi-devel] Patch proposal for 0.8.1 to compile and work outofband under cygwin, Al Chu, 2009/12/11
- RE: [Freeipmi-devel] Patch proposal for 0.8.1 to compile and work outofband under cygwin, Liebig, Holger, 2009/12/14
- [Freeipmi-devel] ipmi-dcmi testing results, Liebig, Holger, 2009/12/14
- [Freeipmi-devel] Re: ipmi-dcmi testing results,
Al Chu <=
- [Freeipmi-devel] RE: ipmi-dcmi testing results, Liebig, Holger, 2009/12/15
- [Freeipmi-devel] RE: ipmi-dcmi testing results, Al Chu, 2009/12/15
- Re: [Freeipmi-devel] RE: ipmi-dcmi testing results, Al Chu, 2009/12/15
- [Freeipmi-devel] RE: ipmi-dcmi testing results, Liebig, Holger, 2009/12/16
- [Freeipmi-devel] RE: ipmi-dcmi testing results, Al Chu, 2009/12/16
- Re: [Freeipmi-devel] RE: ipmi-dcmi testing results, Al Chu, 2009/12/16
- [Freeipmi-devel] Fujitsu Patches for ipmi-oem, Liebig, Holger, 2009/12/17
- Re: [Freeipmi-devel] Fujitsu Patches for ipmi-oem, Al Chu, 2009/12/17
- [Freeipmi-devel] RE: ipmi-dcmi testing results, Liebig, Holger, 2009/12/17
- [Freeipmi-devel] RE: ipmi-dcmi testing results, Al Chu, 2009/12/17