[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Freeipmi-devel] spec file problem
From: |
Albert Chu |
Subject: |
Re: [Freeipmi-devel] spec file problem |
Date: |
Fri, 03 Dec 2004 14:22:21 -0800 |
Hey AB,
> BTW, I added link to your IPMI-Util project from our home page. I am
> now evaluating the rq_seq problem. Thanks for your contribution.
Just to let you know, I put in a fix for ipmi_lan_cmd(). The issue at
hand is how to handle the problem in wrapper functions like
open_lan_session().
Al
--
Albert Chu
address@hidden
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
----- Original Message -----
From: Anand Babu <address@hidden>
Date: Friday, December 3, 2004 7:32 am
Subject: Re: [Freeipmi-devel] spec file problem
> ,----[ "Cress, Andrew R" <address@hidden> ]
> | For IPMI SMBus systems, the IPMI commands use I2C, and the Linux
> | kernel direction for I2C seems to be to consolidate support of
> | various I2C chipsets around lm-sensors, and adoption into
> | distributions of lm-sensors is growing. The leverage for user-space
> | programs to not have to develop chipset drivers for each platform is
> | helpful.
> |
> | So, for a future FreeIPMI SMBus implementation, IMO, FreeIPMI should
> | use lm-sensors, which provides a user-space API. The OpenIPMI
> | project has also taken this approach for SMBus IPMI.
> |
> | This corroborates the fact that the two should play nice in the same
> | sandbox (option 2 below). Eventually they should play together.
> :-)
> `----
> Hi Chris,
> Yes thats the way to go. We already have IPMI SSIF driver working on
> top of I2C device interface on a Intel P4 motherboard. (How ever
> installation of lm-sensors package is not required, I2C driver is a
> part of default Linux kernel). But it is still nice to have both the
> packages co-exist for various practical reasons.
>
> I will take your advice. Clearly everyone is in favor of Option 2
> (changing package names).
>
>
> BTW, I added link to your IPMI-Util project from our home page. I am
> now evaluating the rq_seq problem. Thanks for your contribution.
>
> --
> Anand Babu
> Free as in Freedom <www.gnu.org>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Freeipmi-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freeipmi-devel
>