[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Freeipmi-devel] [bugs #8414] Poor handling of values that can only
From: |
Albert Chu |
Subject: |
Re: [Freeipmi-devel] [bugs #8414] Poor handling of values that can only be set on certain platforms |
Date: |
Thu, 15 Apr 2004 09:01:41 -0700 |
> These values are platform dependent. We cant guess if they
> correct. Correct way is to let the BMC report the status.
I think its fair to say BMC configuration support is platform specific,
but potential input values should still be checked. For example:
### values: Enable = 0, Disable = 1
non_volatile.per_message_authentication 0
If a vendor does not support "non_volatile.per_message_authentication".
bmc-config should output status from the BMC.
But according to the inline comments, the only available input for this
command is 0 or 1. Therefore, an input of "9" or "FOO" should result in
a parse error and an error output from bmc-config.
Al
--
Albert Chu
address@hidden
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
----- Original Message -----
From: Anand Babu <address@hidden>
Date: Thursday, April 15, 2004 1:53 am
Subject: Re: [Freeipmi-devel] [bugs #8414] Poor handling of values that
can only be set on certain platforms
> ,----
> | tdev3|/home/achur 116>/usr/sbin/bmc-config --diff -f conf-new
> | BMC: callback_level.max_privilege_auth_type.none 0
> | USER: callback_level.max_privilege_auth_type.none 9
> |
> | tdev3|/home/achur 117>/usr/sbin/bmc-config --commit -f conf-new
> |
> | We can atleast check that user has input 0 or 1.
> `----
> These values are platform dependent. We cant guess if they
> correct. Correct way is to let the BMC report the status.
>
> --
> _.|_
> (_||_)
> Free as in Freedom <www.gnu.org>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Freeipmi-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freeipmi-devel
>
- Re: [Freeipmi-devel] [bugs #8414] Poor handling of values that can only be set on certain platforms,
Albert Chu <=