[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Freeipmi-devel] future one source tree package naming
From: |
Albert Chu |
Subject: |
Re: [Freeipmi-devel] future one source tree package naming |
Date: |
Tue, 13 Apr 2004 13:30:10 -0700 |
Jim just gave me a few suggestions. How about:
freeipmi - contains shared library libfreeipmi
freeipmi-fish - contains fish, dependent on guile/guile-devel
freeipmi-utils - ipmiping, rmcpping, ipmipower, bmc-watchdog
bmc-watchdog will simply not /sbin/chkconfig --add, it's the admin's
responsibility.
Al
--
Albert Chu
address@hidden
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
----- Original Message -----
From: Albert Chu <address@hidden>
Date: Tuesday, April 13, 2004 12:05 pm
Subject: [Freeipmi-devel] future one source tree package naming
> Hey everyone,
>
> Jim and I have decided to temporarily fork off a local tree of
> libfreeipmi + all tools so we can build just 1 rpm for the admins.
>
> I was hoping we could settle on a naming scheme for the future "one
> source tree" so I don't have to ask the admins to remove some rpms
> thanre-install others. I was thinking about the following. Just
> let me
> know if you agree/disagree with the following:
>
> freeipmi - contains shared library libfreeipmi
> freeipmi-fish - contains fish, dependent on guile/guile-devel
> freeipmi-ipmipower - contains ipmipower
> freeipmi-bmc-watchdog - contains bmc-watchdog
> freeipmi-utils - currently will contain ipmiping and rmcpping, in
> the
> future maybe other stuff
> freeipmi-all - all of the above
>
> I can see ipmipower in freeipmi-utils instead. bmc-watchdog must be
> separate, b/c it installs a daemon.
>
> Al
>
>
>
>
> --
> Albert Chu
> address@hidden
> Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Freeipmi-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freeipmi-devel
>