[Freeipmi-devel] Re: [llnl-devel] More FreeIPMI Changes + Issues to Contend with

[Anand Babu]

Albert Chu <address@hidden> writes:
>> Not at all. This is the fastest and easiest solution. We can
>> use this approach until we finish all required functionalities and
>> later concentrate on session handling. I still don't see a convincing
>> reason to maintain a pool and do session tracking. 
>
>Ok, we'll just deal with session tracking later ...

We may not need session tracking, But will implement drop-n-retry with
rq_seq matching for sure [required, low priority].
We will also hook into ipmi_recvfrom for PEF later on.

-- 
Anand Babu
CaliforniaDigital.com
Office# +1-510-687-7045
Cell# +1-510-396-0717
Home# +1-510-894-0586

Free as in Freedom <www.gnu.org>