|
From: | tps12 |
Subject: | Re: [Fgs-bs] More items |
Date: | Mon, 11 Aug 2003 08:20:05 -0400 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.3a) Gecko/20021212 |
Orating has to do with rating? Maybe you should add a "berating" command.When I thought about match negotiation, I identified three different "levels of specification" as a game went from posted to actually being played. If you're figuring out ratings, then I'll probably just do game negotiation (on the server side) as part of room functionality.
Desired Username wrote:
I started thinking about match negotiation and looking at the code. I figured out what I needed to changewhen I realized the whole thing has to be done over. The current match nego code works on a p2p basis, ifyou will. Instead we need another global array (heh)of open game challenges. In the mean time, I'm looking at the ranking mess. Would you believe that there are *six* differentvariables here? srank, rank, ranked, rated, rating,orating.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |