espressomd-users
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [ESPResSo-users] Grand canonical thermostat


From: Salim Maduar
Subject: Re: [ESPResSo-users] Grand canonical thermostat
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 13:50:21 +0300

Dear, Axel
 
Thank you so much! for the comments
 
Then I will try to use TCL grand-canonical version, but I would optimize it in terms of number of MD and MC steps so that to achieve good speed and stay at equilibrium.
Thank you for the advice.
 
--
 Best Regards,
 Salim Maduar
 
 PhD student 
 
 Faculty of Physics, 
 Lomonosov Moscow State University
 Moscow, Russia
 
 Web: http://nanofluidics.phys.msu.ru/maduar.htm
 
 
 
27.02.2015, 12:33, "Axel Arnold" <address@hidden>:
Hi!

Am 27.02.2015 um 09:26 schrieb Jakub Krajniak <address@hidden>:

On 27.02.2015 07:02, Axel Arnold wrote:
(...)
Note also that you need to be careful when adding particles so often.
The Langevin thermostat needs a while to establish the desired
temperature, namely roughly 1/gamma/dt time steps. So, for gamma=1 and
dt=0.01 you need about 100 steps to “heal” the overall temperature. You
can accelerate that by increasing gamma, however, also the product of
gamma and dt can’t be too large. 20 time steps is already critical, and
10 time steps is from my experience not enough to get the temperature
correct.


I'm sorry for off-topic but that sounds very interesting. So it is possible to calculate how fast Langevin thermostat will bring system to desired temperature? Do you know any reference about that?
 
Well, of course that depends on how far you are off equilibrium. But what gamma (or gamma/m, if you have masses compiled in) tells you is the relaxation time of the resulting dynamics. That is, you can determine gamma from the decay constant of the velocity autocorrelation function. I don’t know any reference on that (nor on the Langevin thermostat, actually), but it is immediately obvious from the Langevin equation, which the Langevin thermostat approximates.
 
As Peter already pointed out, that does not guarantee that the system has equilibrated yet, but before the velocity autocorrelation has decayed, there is no chance that the thermostat has equilibrated even a single degree of freedom.
 
Best,
Axel
 
------------------------------------------------
Dr. Axel Arnold
ICP, Universität Stuttgart
Allmandring 3
70569 Stuttgart, Germany
Email: address@hidden
Phone: +49 711 685 67609

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]