[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Enigma-devel] Improved version of Sentry Duty level
From: |
Nat Pryce |
Subject: |
Re: [Enigma-devel] Improved version of Sentry Duty level |
Date: |
Thu, 30 Jun 2005 12:08:27 +0100 |
On 6/29/05, Erich Schubert <address@hidden> wrote:
> Btw,
> I liked a lot oxyd's rule of having every 10th level being a meditation level.
> Of course it's not as "useful" if you don't have to play them in
> sequence (except for resume codes) and we could well make a
> "meditation" level pack...
I also like the regular meditation levels.
Do we need an effort to write new meditation levels so we have enough?
How many do we need to have one every ten levels? Perhaps every 15
or 20 would be easier to achieve.
--Nat.
- [Enigma-devel] Improved version of Sentry Duty level, Nat Pryce, 2005/06/25
- Message not available
- Re: [Enigma-devel] Improved version of Sentry Duty level, Nat Pryce, 2005/06/27
- Re: [Enigma-devel] Improved version of Sentry Duty level, Moon Pearl, 2005/06/27
- Re: [Enigma-devel] Improved version of Sentry Duty level, Daniel Heck, 2005/06/29
- Re: [Enigma-devel] Improved version of Sentry Duty level, Moon Pearl, 2005/06/29
- Re: [Enigma-devel] Improved version of Sentry Duty level, Karen Pouelle, 2005/06/29
- Re: [Enigma-devel] Improved version of Sentry Duty level, Erich Schubert, 2005/06/29
- Re: [Enigma-devel] Improved version of Sentry Duty level, Jacob Scott, 2005/06/29
- Re: [Enigma-devel] Improved version of Sentry Duty level, Moon Pearl, 2005/06/30
- Re: [Enigma-devel] Improved version of Sentry Duty level,
Nat Pryce <=
- Re: [Enigma-devel] Improved version of Sentry Duty level, Jacob Scott, 2005/06/30
- Re: [Enigma-devel] Improved version of Sentry Duty level, Karen Pouelle, 2005/06/30
- Re: [Enigma-devel] Improved version of Sentry Duty level, Moon Pearl, 2005/06/30
- Re: [Enigma-devel] Improved version of Sentry Duty level, Jacob Scott, 2005/06/30
- Re: [Enigma-devel] Improved version of Sentry Duty level, Erich Schubert, 2005/06/30