I spent some time yesterday playing with a new level format. The old,
procedural way of describing levels has done a fairly good job so far,
but it has serious limits:
* You need some programming skills to use it;
* It's unwieldy for describing complicated levels; the many
renderLine()
variations remedy that problem to a certain degree, but most of them
are particularly easy to use either;
* A procedural description is very unsuitable for automatic generation
and (particularly) interpretation by a level editor. The description
should essentially be data, with optional Lua code for customization
and
special effects.
I had a little discussion with Martin about this a while back. At his
suggested, I did some experiments with an XML-based level format, but
the results did not convince me. There is not much nested structure in
Enigma levels, so XML's syntax gets in the way, as does indentation as
soon as you include Lua code; parsing XML would probably have to be
done
in C++, which is at best annoying; we would need to include another
third-party library etc.
So back to Lua. Here's what I came up with last night. It's still a
little rough in places, but all in all I like the result. It
simplifies
the current renderLine implementations, it's data-based and easy to
read
and write from the editor, you can still include arbitrary Lua code in
the PreCode and PostCode strings, etc.
I'd like your feedback, though, before I start programming and
unwittingly end up with another format that doesn't quite cut it. So,
what do you think?
Cheers,
Daniel
per.oxyd4.lua