Re: help: howto aggregate several properties in one column

[tbanelwebmin]

Two quick-and-dirty workarounds:

1. Eval that prior to using propview:

(setq
 TEST_A "<>"
 TEST_B "<>"
 TEST_C "<>"
 TEST_D "<>")

2. Define this helper macro:

(defmacro valof (symbol)
  `(if (boundp ',symbol)
      ,symbol
    "()"))

Then specify columns like that:

(concat (valof TEST_A) (valof TEST_B))


Have fun
Thierry


On 24-08-11 10:49, Pedro wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am a heavy user of propview [1] and I am very happy with it, but 
> looks like now I reached a limitation, or maybe someone founds a 
> magical workaround. I am open to use another solution outside of 
> propview.
>
> Find attached in file aggregate-props.org that serves as a playground 
> environment and as an example of what I am struggling with, it is 
> posed as a generic example: I want to "merge" two properties into one, 
> no matter if the property exists or no. I am trying to use concat, 
> concat works only when the properties on an item exist, if one of them 
> does not exist, fails, which is unfortunate to what I am trying to 
> achieve, because on one side, I would like to report (with a propview 
> table) the frequency of appearance of each test_a, test_b, test_c, 
> etc. on all nodes with tag :test:, and with another propview table, a 
> summary of all test properties.
>
> There is a workaround based on a precalculation strategy that I kind 
> of hate: do an org-map-entries of all targeted items with tag "test", 
> and update SUMMARY property through an adhoc elisp function all the 
> properties related to test (I am happy with just enumerating all of 
> the involved subproperties, but I recognize, having a regex on 
> property such as test_* or that "starts with" test, would be amazing), 
> then, it is just as easy as adding the new column SUMMARY, but I would 
> like to avoid this solution
>
> Extra note: related to propview, it is not a problem to concat 100 
> elements, because you can do it in an extra shortnamed function, so 
> the column name can be short
>
> So this is what happens, concat of TEST_A and TEST_B is 0
>
> #+BEGIN: propview :scope tree :match "+test" :noquote all :cols (ITEM 
> CREATED TEST_A TEST_B (concat TEST_A TEST_B) (concat TEST_C TEST_D))
> | ITEM    | CREATED                | TEST_A | TEST_B | (concat TEST_A 
> TEST_B) | (concat TEST_C TEST_D) |
> |---------+------------------------+--------+--------+------------------------+------------------------| 
>
> | mytest  | [2024-08-09 Fri 23:53] |      a |      0 
> |                      0 | cd                     |
> | mytest2 | [2024-08-09 Fri 23:53] |      0 |      b 
> |                      0 | cd                     |
> | mytest3 | [2024-08-09 Fri 23:53] |      0 |      0 
> |                      0 | 0                      |
> |---------+------------------------+--------+--------+------------------------+------------------------| 
>
> |         |                        |        | |                        
> |                        |
> #+END:
>
> What I would expect to happen is that in the concat result of TEST_A 
> and TEST_B would appear a or b, maybe that could be done with another 
> function?
>
> #+BEGIN: propview :scope tree :match "+test" :noquote all :cols (ITEM 
> CREATED TEST_A TEST_B (concat TEST_A TEST_B) (concat TEST_C TEST_D))
> | ITEM    | CREATED                | TEST_A | TEST_B | (concat TEST_A 
> TEST_B) | (concat TEST_C TEST_D) |
> |---------+------------------------+--------+--------+------------------------+------------------------| 
>
> | mytest  | [2024-08-09 Fri 23:53] |      a |      0 
> |                      a | cd                     |
> | mytest2 | [2024-08-09 Fri 23:53] |      0 |      b 
> |                      b | cd                     |
> | mytest3 | [2024-08-09 Fri 23:53] |      0 |      0 
> |                      0 | 0                      |
> |---------+------------------------+--------+--------+------------------------+------------------------| 
>
> |         |                        |        | |                        
> |                        |
> #+END:
>
> Cheers,
> pedeb
>
> [1] https://orgmode.org/worg/org-contrib/org-collector.html