[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] In case of Sly, let org-babel-execute:lisp use Slynk instead
From: |
Ihor Radchenko |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] In case of Sly, let org-babel-execute:lisp use Slynk instead of Swank |
Date: |
Thu, 30 Mar 2023 10:10:55 +0000 |
gerard.vermeulen@posteo.net writes:
>> I'd appreciate if other ob-lisp users could test the patch with both
>> SLY
>> and SLIME.
>>
>> I have no comments on the Elisp part of the patch.
>
> I have a few additional remarks:
>
> The patch is against main only because it overlaps a region where bugfix
> and main diverged. I am willing to provide a similar patch against
> main.
I do not think that we in a hurry to put this onto bugfix.
Bugfix is just for trivial and critical fixes.
https://orgmode.org/worg/org-maintenance.html#release-types
Writing the whole extra alternative patch is probably too much to bother.
> I hope that my mail reaches David (CC-ed dto@gnu.org taken from the
> file header), but my previous message bounced (non-existent address).
I am CCing his alternative (AFAIK) email.
David, if you are still interested to deal with ob-lisp, we can update
the email.
--
Ihor Radchenko // yantar92,
Org mode contributor,
Learn more about Org mode at <https://orgmode.org/>.
Support Org development at <https://liberapay.com/org-mode>,
or support my work at <https://liberapay.com/yantar92>