|
From: | Max Nikulin |
Subject: | cgit and merge commit |
Date: | Sat, 14 Jan 2023 22:09:21 +0700 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.4.2 |
On 14/01/2023 17:35, Ihor Radchenko wrote:
Max Nikulin writes:So Matt did not squashed commits before committing to the main branch and detailed commit messages are preserved. That is why I do not consider cgit render as a strong enough reason for reverting.Should we then report a bug to cgit mailing list?
I do not have particular opinion. I rarely use web UI for git and mostly for blame. I prefer to do it with local clone. I have never read cgit docs. Perhaps it may be more apparent that it is a merge commit.
Anyway at first I would ask the savannah team. E.g. vanilla debbugs instance is significantly more convenient than the GNU ones and the changes in the latter are intentional. Mhonarc (list archive) at lists.debian.org has better configuration than at lists.gnu.org as well. So there might be specific of particular instance.
After all, it may be convenient to review cumulative changes. When I worked with gerrit (a web application for code review) sometimes it was inconvenient that it was impossible to see diff for whole commit series.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |