[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bash results broken?
From: |
Ihor Radchenko |
Subject: |
Re: Bash results broken? |
Date: |
Mon, 26 Dec 2022 09:26:05 +0000 |
Matt <matt@excalamus.com> writes:
> ---- On Sun, 25 Dec 2022 06:23:53 -0500 Ihor Radchenko wrote ---
> > As you see, "%S" have been used previously for non-string results.
> > I cannot find explanation in git log.
> >
> > That said, I think that it will be more consistent to leave strings
> > specifically as is. See the attached patch.
>
> That makes sense and works for me.
Applied onto bugfix.
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git/commit/?id=b11abb409
--
Ihor Radchenko // yantar92,
Org mode contributor,
Learn more about Org mode at <https://orgmode.org/>.
Support Org development at <https://liberapay.com/org-mode>,
or support my work at <https://liberapay.com/yantar92>
ob-shell intentions and paperwork (was Bash results broken?), Matt, 2022/12/21
- Re: ob-shell intentions and paperwork (was Bash results broken?), Matt, 2022/12/27
- Re: ob-shell intentions and paperwork (was Bash results broken?), Ihor Radchenko, 2022/12/29
- Re: ob-shell intentions and paperwork (was Bash results broken?), Bastien Guerry, 2022/12/29
- Re: ob-shell intentions and paperwork (was Bash results broken?), Matt, 2022/12/30
- Re: ob-shell intentions and paperwork (was Bash results broken?), Bastien Guerry, 2022/12/30
- Re: ob-shell intentions and paperwork (was Bash results broken?), Matt, 2022/12/30
- Re: ob-shell intentions and paperwork (was Bash results broken?), Ihor Radchenko, 2022/12/31
Re: ob-shell intentions and paperwork (was Bash results broken?), Ihor Radchenko, 2022/12/31