[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [MAINTENANCE] Do we have any backwards-compatibility policy for thir
From: |
Tim Cross |
Subject: |
Re: [MAINTENANCE] Do we have any backwards-compatibility policy for third-party packages? |
Date: |
Sun, 11 Dec 2022 14:24:07 +1100 |
User-agent: |
mu4e 1.9.4; emacs 29.0.60 |
Ihor Radchenko <yantar92@posteo.net> writes:
> Tim Cross <theophilusx@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> I guess we are limited by what the packages we rely on support. For
>> example, if geiser doesn't support Emacs 26 but org is supposed to,
>> there isn't much we can do. We cannot afford to fork geiser and modify
>> it to add the support and even if we provided a patch to add the support
>> to the geiser project, they may not merge it.
>>
>> Best we can do is best effort and reflect this limitation in the manual
>> where we stipulate what our backwards compatibility policy is.
>
> Ok. Here are the tentative patches for Org manual and WORG maintenance
> page.
>
No objections from me. Just based on reading the patches, they appear to
clarify our support policy and therefore should be helpful.