Re: [PATCH] Re: Update Org to MathJax 3

[Rudolf Adamkovič]

Ihor Radchenko <yantar92@posteo.net> writes:

> The proper test is not presence of the message, but the correct
> conversion of the legacy options in the actual html output.

We do test the results in the HTML output, of course.  Still, I would
like to test the user messages too.  By my definition, "proper" tests
verify all requirements.  Hence, I ask: Do we want to reliably notify
the user?  If we do not, we can remove the messages.  If we do, then we
either test the messages or they will break at some random point in time
and generate yet another pointless mail thread.

If we do not have any better idea, then I can define a variable that
points to the 'message' function by default.  The relevant tests can
then set the variable to a function that gathers messages in a list.
With that, the tests can verify that the list contains exactly one
instance of the expected message.

Rudy
-- 
"It is no paradox to say that in our most theoretical moods we may be
nearest to our most practical applications."
-- Alfred North Whitehead, 1861-1947

Rudolf Adamkovič <salutis@me.com> [he/him]
Studenohorská 25
84103 Bratislava
Slovakia