[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Org and Hyperbole
From: |
David Masterson |
Subject: |
Re: Org and Hyperbole |
Date: |
Mon, 10 Oct 2022 09:44:21 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) |
Jean Louis <bugs@gnu.support> writes:
> * Robert Weiner <rsw@gnu.org> [2022-10-09 00:06]:
>> There are many reasons for this including limits in many
>> organizations of the file types that may be transferred through
>> common protocols and the difficulty of maintaining relational
>> database or structured file type schemas across time.
>
> I can't see how relational database is more difficult to maintain then
> for example Emacs itself. Emacs is master of difficulties for computer
> user. For example I have not touched configuration files for
> PostgreSQL since years, if not decades. I start wondering why.
The issue here is distribution. Databases tend to be centralized and
heavy weight. Here, we're simply looking for a standard way to capture
an image (or more) with a task/note and tranport it back to your main
Org file (a la Org Mobile or ...). Org is lightweight in this area
which is good and bad.
--
David Masterson
Re: Org and Hyperbole, Jean Louis, 2022/10/07
Re: Org and Hyperbole, Robert Weiner, 2022/10/08
Re: Org and Hyperbole, Jean Louis, 2022/10/07