[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: IM dev discussions?
From: |
Ihor Radchenko |
Subject: |
Re: IM dev discussions? |
Date: |
Tue, 27 Sep 2022 17:50:35 +0800 |
Bastien <bzg@gnu.org> writes:
> Ihor Radchenko <yantar92@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Maybe we can nicely ask moderators/active users of reddit/SO to redirect
>> people to Org ML when appropriate? Similar to our current effort with
>> contributor stewards.
>
> That's a very good idea!
>
> If these contributor stewards agree, we can even advertise their role
> on https://orgmode.org/worg/org-maintenance.html
Agree.
Which social website do you have in mind?
I can ask @alphapapa from /r/orgmode.
I guess we can also ask people hanging out on Doom discord and
discourse.
Maybe also Org roam people. They have discourse.
>> May we set a single account on GitHub and link it to Org ML so that
>> people can @mention Org team on GitHub, and we automatically get the
>> email directly to Org ML?
>
> I'm against it: it will make it easier for Org ecosystem maintainers
> on GitHub to send notifications to the Org ML without joining it while
> probably forcing Org maintainers on the ML to follow-up discussions on
> GitHub. That's not a positive outcome.
Fair point. GitHub email never displays comment edits, and I am not sure
how reliable is Github-to-email bridge for complex interactions.
> What I suggest instead to do is to document GitHub accounts of Org
> core maintainers on worg/org-maintenance.org for those who have one.
This sounds reasonable.
> This way maintainers of Org libraries on GitHub will know they can @
> these accounts in their issues. And it will stay the responsability
> of Org core maintainers to decide how to deal with these issues.
>
> For some of them, it will just lead to a reply on the issue (as when
> Org maintainers contribute to non-official Org spaces, like the Doom
> or spacemacs discord servers); for issues that are of importance for
> Org core development, we should suggest them to send an email to the
> list.
I am unsure how visible this kind of information will be for new
third-party package maintainers.
Should we add some information to Appendix A Hacking section of the
manual? (something along the lines that one may contact Org maintainers
in other media like IRC, Matrix, etc and then link to worg/org-maintenance.org)
Or maybe have a section in worg/org-contribute.org? An extension to
"Write add-ons" item.
And, of course, we need to announce this to the existing maintainers.
Upcoming Emacsconf may be a good opportunity.
--
Ihor Radchenko,
Org mode contributor,
Learn more about Org mode at https://orgmode.org/.
Support Org development at https://liberapay.com/org-mode,
or support my work at https://liberapay.com/yantar92
- Re: Matrix (was Re: IM dev discussions?), (continued)
- Re: Matrix (was Re: IM dev discussions?), Tim Cross, 2022/09/22
- Re: Matrix (was Re: IM dev discussions?), Bastien, 2022/09/23
- Re: IM dev discussions?, Ihor Radchenko, 2022/09/22
- Re: IM dev discussions?, Bastien, 2022/09/23
- Re: IM dev discussions?, Ihor Radchenko, 2022/09/23
- Re: IM dev discussions?, Bastien, 2022/09/25
- Re: IM dev discussions?, Timothy, 2022/09/25
- Re: IM dev discussions?, Bastien, 2022/09/26
- Re: IM dev discussions?, Ihor Radchenko, 2022/09/26
- Re: IM dev discussions?, Bastien, 2022/09/26
- Re: IM dev discussions?,
Ihor Radchenko <=
- Re: IM dev discussions?, Bastien, 2022/09/27
- Re: IM dev discussions?, Ihor Radchenko, 2022/09/28
- Re: IM dev discussions?, Tim Cross, 2022/09/23
- Re: IM dev discussions?, Timothy, 2022/09/23
- Re: IM dev discussions?, Ihor Radchenko, 2022/09/24
- Re: IM dev discussions?, Bastien, 2022/09/25
- Re: IM dev discussions?, Timothy, 2022/09/25
- Re: IM dev discussions?, Fraga, Eric, 2022/09/25
- Re: IM dev discussions?, Bastien, 2022/09/26
- Re: IM dev discussions?, Mark Barton, 2022/09/23