[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: IM dev discussions?
From: |
Bastien |
Subject: |
Re: IM dev discussions? |
Date: |
Mon, 26 Sep 2022 07:03:07 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Hi Timothy,
Timothy <orgmode@tec.tecosaur.net> writes:
> Yep, but I do think it’s good to have a few promoted places, ideally based on
> FOSS services. Not to start another tangent, but this is one of the reasons
> why
> I think discourse could be a good idea — as a FOSS replacement for reddit,
> stackoverflow, etc.
If someone wants to set up a Discourse instance and maintain it, of
course (s)he can. The question is: should this become an *official*
place for Org discussions, maintained by Org maintainers? I don't
think this is desirable, given the resources we have*.
It is sooooo easy to set up a Discourse instance and quite difficult
to maintain it in the long run -- also, how to explain to newcomers
when to send messages to Discourse and when to reach the list? This
will probably end up as "a place for users" (Discourse) and "a place
for developers" (the ML), which I don't want.
* FWIW I would much prefer to have contributors commit to enhance
Worg: it is a critical resource, seen by ~30K per month, and many
pages are outdated.
>> I think I get your point about categorisation in general, but in this
>> case, there is the risk of excluding a category of people (lurkers,
>> occasional contributors, etc.) or more precisely: to incidently and
>> inadvertently encourage them to self-exclude themselves.
>
> I hear what you’re saying, I’m just not sure how much of an issue this
> actually
> would be. My initial suspicion is with a this issue would be small to
> non-existent.
Perhaps -- or perhaps not. What Ihor says in another email is that
people who post on e.g. reddit don't want to bother hardcore devs on
this list. I'm quite sure if we setup an official #org-dev channel,
people from #org-mode will shy away from #org-dev.
>> Is it possible to lurk in a Matrix room without any login?
>
> With a matrix client you can peek in public rooms without joining them, and
> <https://view.matrix.org/room/%21rUhEinythPhVTdddsb:matrix.org/> currently
> exists.
This link does not allow me to send an anonymous/pseudonymous message
to the Matrix room, right? That's what I'm talking about, that IRC
permits.
All best,
--
Bastien
- Re: IM dev discussions?, (continued)
- Re: IM dev discussions?, Ihor Radchenko, 2022/09/26
- Re: IM dev discussions?, Tim Cross, 2022/09/23
- Re: IM dev discussions?, Timothy, 2022/09/23
- Re: IM dev discussions?, Ihor Radchenko, 2022/09/24
- Re: IM dev discussions?, Bastien, 2022/09/25
- Re: IM dev discussions?, Timothy, 2022/09/25
- Re: IM dev discussions?, Fraga, Eric, 2022/09/25
- Re: IM dev discussions?,
Bastien <=
- Re: IM dev discussions?, Mark Barton, 2022/09/23
- Re: IM dev discussions?, Ihor Radchenko, 2022/09/24
- Re: IM dev discussions?, Jean Louis, 2022/09/24
- Re: IM dev discussions?, Bastien, 2022/09/25
- Re: IM dev discussions?, Ihor Radchenko, 2022/09/25
- Re: IM dev discussions? (was: orgmode.org welcome page says to install via MELPA but as writing, this cannot be done), Jean Louis, 2022/09/24
- Re: IM dev discussions? (was: orgmode.org welcome page says to install via MELPA but as writing, this cannot be done), Ihor Radchenko, 2022/09/24
- Re: IM dev discussions? (was: orgmode.org welcome page says to install via MELPA but as writing, this cannot be done), Timothy, 2022/09/25
- Re: IM dev discussions? (was: orgmode.org welcome page says to install via MELPA but as writing, this cannot be done), Russell Adams, 2022/09/25
- Re: IM dev discussions? (was: orgmode.org welcome page says to install via MELPA but as writing, this cannot be done), Ihor Radchenko, 2022/09/26