[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: We have asynchronous sessions, why have anything else?
From: |
Ivar Fredholm |
Subject: |
Re: We have asynchronous sessions, why have anything else? |
Date: |
Wed, 06 Jul 2022 01:41:13 +0000 |
Hi Ihor, I have a prototype of what I mentioned earlier, at least for python.
This supports asynchronous, synchronous, session, and session-less blocks. It's
pretty messy but it helps to illustrate what I had in mind. Let me know what
you think.
Sent with Proton Mail secure email.
------- Original Message -------
On Monday, June 27th, 2022 at 4:56 AM, Ihor Radchenko <yantar92@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Ivar Fredholm freddyholms@protonmail.com writes:
>
> > I believe the two could be unified if we expand the functionality of
> > the async filter to look for 'exception' tags. Then each language
> > implementation must only put the org-babel src block in a try-except
> > type construction and put the error message into the except block.
>
>
> I am not even sure if all the babel backends support try-except.
> Think about ob-gnuplot or, say, ob-latex.
>
> Best,
> Ihor
ob-session4.el
Description: Text Data
- Re: We have asynchronous sessions, why have anything else?,
Ivar Fredholm <=