emacs-orgmode
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [BUG] org-capture autoload bug? [9.5.2 (9.5.2-gfbff08 @ /home/ignaci


From: Ihor Radchenko
Subject: Re: [BUG] org-capture autoload bug? [9.5.2 (9.5.2-gfbff08 @ /home/ignacio/.emacs.d/elpa/org-9.5.2/)]
Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2022 21:32:15 +0800

Ignacio Casso <ignaciocasso@hotmail.com> writes:

> Then we should decide if we want to use autoload cookies for custom
> variables to make this work also with lexical binding. Otherwise, code
> like the snippet above would produce an error in Emacs 29, and in Emacs
> 27 the let binding would be ignored (although at least the custom setter
> would work). I have no opinion regarding this last point since I don't
> remember what were the disadvantages of using autoload cookies for
> custom variables.

AFAIK, autoloading defcustoms is not discussed in the manual. I have no
idea about possible pitfalls as well.

> I've prepared a patch for the first point, which I attach at the end of
> this email. All changes fall in one of the following cases:
>
> - `set-default' -> `set-default-toplevel-value' (as explained)
>
> - `set' -> `set-default-toplevel-value'
>
>   The same, but in this cases there was another bug: If a buffer set the
>   custom variable locally before the feature was autoloaded, the setter
>   of the variable would not set the standard value as the default for
>   other buffers, and would overwrite the buffer-local value.
>
> - :set 'set-default -> nothing, since it would be already the default
>
> I don't really know what most of the variables whose setter I have
> changed do or whether it makes any sense to use them inside a let
> binding, but I have made the change for all of them nevertheless, since
> it can not harm and could potentially fix a bug. Feel free to restrict
> those changes only to those variables where it makes sense, such as
> `org-capture-templates', if you want to keep the patch small and simple.

LGTM! Unless others have objections, I am inclined to merge the patch
fully. But please add changlog entries to the commit message.

Best,
Ihor



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]