[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: org-cite styles don't allow * in them
From: |
Ihor Radchenko |
Subject: |
Re: org-cite styles don't allow * in them |
Date: |
Thu, 21 Apr 2022 21:40:49 +0800 |
Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr> writes:
> I had your
>
> *bold [cite:citet*:@key]
>
> example in mind. Sure, if bold jumps across the citation this is
> different. I'm not sure this is something that is frequent enough to
> worry.
According to Prof. Kitchin, it is not frequent. However, if it does
happen it will be very annoying to deal with.
> Besides, the suggested idea of using [cite/citet*/:@key] for
> disambiguation seems fine (as long as they are implemented).
Maybe we can make trailing "/" alias of the same style without slash?
(e.g. cite/citet*/ is treated as alias of cite/citet* even if
cite/citet*/ is not explicitly defined by the processor) I do not think
that we can afford to rely on external processors to take care about
this.
best,
Ihor
- Re: org-cite styles don't allow * in them, (continued)
- Re: org-cite styles don't allow * in them, Ihor Radchenko, 2022/04/17
- Re: org-cite styles don't allow * in them, John Kitchin, 2022/04/17
- Re: org-cite styles don't allow * in them, Ihor Radchenko, 2022/04/17
- Re: org-cite styles don't allow * in them, John Kitchin, 2022/04/17
- Re: org-cite styles don't allow * in them, Ihor Radchenko, 2022/04/18
- Re: org-cite styles don't allow * in them, Bruce D'Arcus, 2022/04/18
- Re: org-cite styles don't allow * in them, Ihor Radchenko, 2022/04/18
- Re: org-cite styles don't allow * in them, Nicolas Goaziou, 2022/04/21
- Re: org-cite styles don't allow * in them, Ihor Radchenko, 2022/04/21
- Re: org-cite styles don't allow * in them, Nicolas Goaziou, 2022/04/21
- Re: org-cite styles don't allow * in them,
Ihor Radchenko <=
- Re: org-cite styles don't allow * in them, Bruce D'Arcus, 2022/04/22
- Re: org-cite styles don't allow * in them, John Kitchin, 2022/04/22