[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Depreciating TeX-style LaTeX fragments
From: |
Rudolf Adamkovič |
Subject: |
Re: Depreciating TeX-style LaTeX fragments |
Date: |
Sun, 16 Jan 2022 18:45:24 +0100 |
Colin Baxter 😺 <m43cap@yandex.com> writes:
> \(g=\lim_{\delta m\to 0}(\delta F/\delta m)\)
>
> Backslash city! I know which one I'd prefer to read.
Further, in-text single-letter variables that permeate mathematical
writing, and I think everyone would agree that $k$ reads well. Alas, as
soon as one needs to write $k$-th, it stops working and one must rewrite
as \(k\)-th. So, one often ends up using both ways anyway, right?
Rudy
--
"Logic is a science of the necessary laws of thought, without which no
employment of the understanding and the reason takes place." -- Immanuel
Kant, 1785
Rudolf Adamkovič <salutis@me.com> [he/him]
Studenohorská 25
84103 Bratislava
Slovakia
- Org Syntax Specification, Timothy, 2022/01/09
- Re: Org Syntax Specification, Sébastien Miquel, 2022/01/15
- Re: Depreciating TeX-style LaTeX fragments (was: Org Syntax Specification), Timothy, 2022/01/15
- Re: Depreciating TeX-style LaTeX fragments (was: Org Syntax Specification), Sébastien Miquel, 2022/01/16
- Re: Depreciating TeX-style LaTeX fragments, Martin Steffen, 2022/01/16
- Re: Depreciating TeX-style LaTeX fragments, Colin Baxter 😺, 2022/01/16
- Re: Depreciating TeX-style LaTeX fragments, Tim Cross, 2022/01/16
- Re: Depreciating TeX-style LaTeX fragments, Juan Manuel Macías, 2022/01/16
- Re: Depreciating TeX-style LaTeX fragments, Colin Baxter 😺, 2022/01/16
- Re: Depreciating TeX-style LaTeX fragments, Greg Minshall, 2022/01/16
- Re: Depreciating TeX-style LaTeX fragments,
Rudolf Adamkovič <=
- Re: Depreciating TeX-style LaTeX fragments, Eric S Fraga, 2022/01/16
- Re: Depreciating TeX-style LaTeX fragments, Anthony Cowley, 2022/01/16
Re: Org Syntax Specification, Tom Gillespie, 2022/01/17