[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Depreciating TeX-style LaTeX fragments
From: |
Juan Manuel Macías |
Subject: |
Re: Depreciating TeX-style LaTeX fragments |
Date: |
Sun, 16 Jan 2022 13:26:39 +0000 |
Colin Baxter writes:
> Ah, LaTeX3 - whatever happened to that?
If you're a LaTeX user, you're already using LaTeX3 to a very high
extent, even if you don't see it. The current idea is not to replace
LaTeX2e with LaTeX3 as a new version, but to gradually incorporate
elements of LaTeX3 into the LaTeX kernel, like the new syntax, xparse,
etc. LaTeX3 is already present in many aspects of LaTeX, and that is an
undeniable advance. If anyone is interested in the state of the art,
this short talk by Frank Mittelbach at TUG 2020 is very illustrative:
https://invidious.snopyta.org/watch?v=zNci4lcb8Vo
Best regards,
Juan Manuel
- Org Syntax Specification, Timothy, 2022/01/09
- Re: Org Syntax Specification, Sébastien Miquel, 2022/01/15
- Re: Depreciating TeX-style LaTeX fragments (was: Org Syntax Specification), Timothy, 2022/01/15
- Re: Depreciating TeX-style LaTeX fragments (was: Org Syntax Specification), Sébastien Miquel, 2022/01/16
- Re: Depreciating TeX-style LaTeX fragments, Martin Steffen, 2022/01/16
- Re: Depreciating TeX-style LaTeX fragments, Colin Baxter 😺, 2022/01/16
- Re: Depreciating TeX-style LaTeX fragments, Tim Cross, 2022/01/16
- Re: Depreciating TeX-style LaTeX fragments,
Juan Manuel Macías <=
- Re: Depreciating TeX-style LaTeX fragments, Colin Baxter 😺, 2022/01/16
- Re: Depreciating TeX-style LaTeX fragments, Greg Minshall, 2022/01/16
- Re: Depreciating TeX-style LaTeX fragments, Rudolf Adamkovič, 2022/01/16
- Re: Depreciating TeX-style LaTeX fragments, Eric S Fraga, 2022/01/16
- Re: Depreciating TeX-style LaTeX fragments, Anthony Cowley, 2022/01/16
Re: Org Syntax Specification, Tom Gillespie, 2022/01/17