emacs-orgmode
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [BUG] adjacent italic and underline don't render correctly [9.5.1 (9


From: Ihor Radchenko
Subject: Re: [BUG] adjacent italic and underline don't render correctly [9.5.1 (9.5.1-g36086a @ /Users/rob/.emacs.d/elpa/org-9.5.1/)]
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2021 00:03:14 +0800

Robert Nikander <robert.nikander@icloud.com> writes:

> Also the bug I reported is back. 
>
> Maybe I’ll just stick with the builtin org package 9.4.4.  

Actually, I missed that you are on ELPA version. Apparently I forgot to
fix the problem on stable Org version (which is what you get from ELPA).

I pushed the fix now. It should be uploaded to ELPA in a few hours.

> Thank you for checking. I tried to reinstall the package, but it did not 
> help, and it caused another problem where I could not quit emacs.
>
> Details… I ran M-x list-packages, found and deleted my org package, quit 
> emacs. Restarted emacs and I saw I had the builtin org (lower version: 9.4.4) 
> and the bug I reported is gone. I tried reinstalling the 9.5.1 org package 
> (after restarting emacs), and it installed, and then I couldn’t quit emacs 
> without killing it. If I ran my usual quit command 
> (save-buffers-kill-terminal) or tried to quit from the macOS menu, I got this 
> message:
>
> org-clock-kill-emacs-query: Symbol’s function definition is void: 
> org-clocking-buffer

This is annoying. We have seen this kind of issue for users using
non-standard package managers, but I do not recall such problems with
ELPA.

I afraid that the problem is partially on Emacs side. We may want to
discuss this with Emacs devs as well, not just within Org mailing list.

> Am I supposed to somehow delete the builtin one when I install 9.5.1? Here is 
> what the buffer looks like when I hit enter on the installed 9.5.1 package:

AFAIU, things went wrong because you had built-in Org loaded while
installing newer Org. (note that there is nothing wrong on your side,
just some internal Emacs workings we need to resolve or work around)

Best,
Ihor




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]