[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: transclusion, tangling, flycheck/flymake, etc.
From: |
Greg Minshall |
Subject: |
Re: transclusion, tangling, flycheck/flymake, etc. |
Date: |
Wed, 03 Nov 2021 15:55:56 +0300 |
Ihor,
thanks for the clarification.
maybe, in that ideal world, <<name()>> might expand, optionally.
another point: watching Noboru's "most recent" (9?) video, i see another
feature of his transclusion: a way to say, "this is *exactly* like a
source block -- with language, :results, :tangle, :var, etc.,
... except, the actual code is in some other file: when i hit =C-c C-c=
here, please set up (based on language), include that source, execute
it".
that also might be interesting. if i were to think of that, i'd say the
verb might *not* be =#+transclude=, but, rather, something source
specific (=#+src_ref=?). but, it might allow a =:transclude yes=
property.
cheers, Greg