emacs-orgmode
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: the GNU bug tracker, use it or have something similar? Gmane might b


From: Max Nikulin
Subject: Re: the GNU bug tracker, use it or have something similar? Gmane might block attachments in bug reports
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2021 00:00:12 +0700
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0

On 25/10/2021 21:21, Uwe Brauer wrote:

org-submit-bug-report sends an email to the org-mode mailing list. It
turns out, that if you attach a file and later display that message on
gmane, as I do in order to keep my email traffic in moderate numbers,
then gmane might block that attachment.

I do not see your attachment on news.gmane.io as well, but it is a rare problem. Mostly attachments are received correctly. Moreover, a part of your message is truncated. I am unsure whether there is some limit for message size or parser was confused by excessive white spaces (unsure whether the message was fully conformant). Anyway, size of "current state" part tells that it is unlikely *minimal* example that you tested with "emacs -Q". Even the part received by gmane has size of almost 300k.

Now GNU emacs has a bug tracker what can be accessed via debbugs-org and
there this problem does not appear.

The org mailing list does have a similar bug tracker which is a bit of
problem with such a workflow.

Attachment is available on
87a6j02qf0.fsf@mat.ucm.es/">https://list.orgmode.org/orgmode/87a6j02qf0.fsf@mat.ucm.es/
so I do not see any problem. Likely nobody explicitly confirmed your bug, so it did not appear on https://updates.orgmode.org/ On the other hand, a patch appeared quickly enough, so reasons to complain are unclear for me.

Of course an alternative would be to CC the bug report to the GNU emacs
list since org mode is also in the GNU emacs tree, but I am not sure
whether this is a good idea.

I am unsure to which list you are going to send a copy. Emacs-orgmode is hosted on gnu.org just as other emacs lists. Besides lists.gnu.org it is archived on public inbox instances and these archives were able to parse your message. For issues filed through debbugs.gnu.org latency is often higher that for ones sent directly to this list.

Are there evidences that it was not a rare case when an attachments from a messages generated by org-submit-bug-report was lost by gmane and change of workflow is really required?




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]