emacs-orgmode
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [org-cite] add convention for direct commands, process for adding ma


From: Bruce D'Arcus
Subject: Re: [org-cite] add convention for direct commands, process for adding mappings to export processor(s)?
Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2021 10:28:10 -0400

Just bumping this. Nicolas, in particular, any thoughts?

On Thu, Sep 9, 2021 at 2:37 PM Bruce D'Arcus <bdarcus@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> The current list of styles and variants included in the oc export
> processors was a first step, with a goal to provide a solid starting
> point, and citations that are more-or-less portable across the
> backends.
>
> But that raises an obvious question: what next?
>
> I'd like, for example, to suggest adding "noauthor/bare" -> "cite*" to
> oc-biblatex.
>
> I also think we should add a way for users to use a direct command for
> natbib and biblatex.
>
> As I've looked into some of what I'd call corner cases, consistency
> breaks down a bit, so it may not be advisable to add explicit support
> for certain options, since they won't work across different backends
> anyway.
>
> Perhaps some prefix for a style that signals to pass on directly for a
> specific export processor; like [cite/blx+footcite ...].
>
> In that case, the oc-biblatex processor would pass that command on as
> is, but other processors would ignore it, and use the default instead.
>
> The documentation would just need to emphasize use of such commands
> would necessarily tie those citations to the specific export backend.
>
> And if we were to add this, we'd still need to answer my first
> question: when and how to add specific style/variant mappings to the
> oc processors.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Bruce



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]