[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: "Unknown processor biblatex"
From: |
Eric S Fraga |
Subject: |
Re: "Unknown processor biblatex" |
Date: |
Mon, 04 Oct 2021 12:11:26 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.60 (gnu/linux) |
Colin,
I also only use the basics when writing articles. With the new
org-cite, the closest I have is with the following settings, as an
example:
#+cite_export: natbib plain
#+latex_header: \usepackage[numbers,sort,super]{natbib}
#+bibliography: ~/[...]/bibliography.bib
This converts the simplest [cite:@author] to \citep{author}. Natbib
settings need to be adjusted to your tastes/needs, of course.
In my org configuration, I have
#+begin_src emacs-lisp
(require 'oc-basic)
(require 'oc-csl)
(require 'oc-natbib)
#+end_src
to cover all the bases.
I have not been able to get away from using natbib for LaTeX export,
unfortunately. A simple basic bibtex org-cite exporter would be
welcome, one that simply generates \cite{author} without any frills.
It's important to highlight that, to me, the advantage of org-cite, over
what I was using before with my own cite: link definition, is that
changing that first line to something like
#+cite_export: csl "[...]/acm-siggraph.csl"
lets me export the same document to ODT or text with the
citations. It's not something I need often but I did in fact need it
just recently and was greatly welcome!
HTH,
eric
--
: Eric S Fraga via Emacs 28.0.60, Org release_9.5-30-g9e71df
: Latest paper written in org: https://arxiv.org/abs/2106.05096