[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] Don't fill displayed equations
From: |
Colin Baxter |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] Don't fill displayed equations |
Date: |
Thu, 30 Sep 2021 20:17:57 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
>>>>> Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr> writes:
> Timothy <tecosaur@gmail.com> writes:
>> Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr> writes:
>>
>>> I strongly disagree with this. \[...\] is an inline element, not
>>> a block element. As such, it can be filled, and filling function
>>> should obey to the inner structure of the document.
>>>
>>> You can use a real block element here, e.g.,
>>> \begin{equation*}...\end{equation*}, which will not be filled.
>>
>> Given that \[ ... \] is an alias for \begin{equation*} ...
>> \end{equation*}
> This is true in LaTeX, not in Org, obviously.
But shouldn't org be consistent with LaTeX. In both org-mode and LaTeX I
would write an in-line equation as $1+3=3$ and not as \[1+2=3\]. I would
reserve the latter for an unlabelled block equation. As has been said,
\[ is an alias for \begin{equation*}. For me, I would rather not write
equations in org-mode differently from LaTeX.
Best wishes,
Colin Baxter.
- [PATCH] Don't fill displayed equations, Timothy, 2021/09/30
- Re: [PATCH] Don't fill displayed equations, Timothy, 2021/09/30
- Re: [PATCH] Don't fill displayed equations, Nicolas Goaziou, 2021/09/30
- Re: [PATCH] Don't fill displayed equations, Timothy, 2021/09/30
- Re: [PATCH] Don't fill displayed equations, Timothy, 2021/09/30
- Re: [PATCH] Don't fill displayed equations, Nicolas Goaziou, 2021/09/30