Re: [PATCH] Allow tangling to a list of files

[Jacopo De Simoi]

Dear Vladimir, 

 thanks for your reply.

Let me show you two examples; they are both WIP and incomplete, but you'll get 
the gist. 

- Example 1

https://gist.github.com/85c9b9c9ab151c5fd35bd761ef6ef569

This is my literate config for .zshrc; as you can see different blocks are 
tangled to different set of files; hence the output files differ (as some 
blocks 
are present and other are not) 

- Example 2

https://gist.github.com/2bce5d6df3f04c934fb4beda0c6560ad

This is my literate config for xkb maps; I have several keyboards, and some of 
them require slightly different maps.

Once again, likely all this can be accomplished by some noweb magic, but I find 
my approach much less intrusive (particularly the initial bit in the .zshrc, 
which I am still refactoring, where the list of tangle targets is inferred 
from the headline tags)

Thanks again for your comments. I'd really like to see how to do the same with 
noweb and compare my approach with the "standard" one. Once more, I hope these 
examples clarify my point of view. 

Best 
 Jacopo

On Tuesday, July 6, 2021 2:11:09 AM EDT Vladimir Lomov wrote:
> Hello!
> 
> ** Jacopo De Simoi via General discussions about Org-mode.
> 
> <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org> [2021-07-06 01:09:30 -0400]:
> > Hi Greg,
> > 
> > thanks for your comments!
> > 
> > On Tuesday, July 6, 2021 12:43:54 AM EDT Greg Minshall wrote:
> >> hi, Jacopo,
> >> 
> >> i'm not convinced this is needed over and above your old "solution" of
> >> using <<noweb>> witn N-different source blocks, each :tangle'ing to a
> >> different file.
> > 
> > To be honest I never quite managed to get it work... =)
> > 
> > My point here is to be able to have one org file tangle'ing to several,
> > slightly different outputs.  Ideally I want to use one readable literate
> > config for all my machines; the config can then be published (or
> > exported) to html
> I do the same with 'noweb' feature.
> 
> > Say I want to create an org file to tangle .tmux.conf (or .zshrc) for
> > different machines; then most of the conf file would be the same (and
> > each such block would be tangled to all files) whereas some specifics
> > could be tangled to corresponding files only (e.g. ALIASes or EDITORs)
> 
> How this could be solved by your approach by tangling to several files? They
> will be identical!
> 
> > Even if a solution using noweb could work, I find being able to tangle to
> > a
> > list of files more readable and elegant.
> 
> Could you explain this a bit more? How you will see that (assuming you have
> exported Org to HTML) this goes into different files? Again, if you tangle
> to several files they content will be the same! Then why you need different
> files?
> 
> > Especially when exporting the org in an external format,
> > 
> > I think the noweb solution would look like a hack,
> 
> IMHO, yes, this is a hack and the "standard" way. I would suggest to read
> again Org manual concerning "Literate programming".
> 
> > whereas a solution with tangle-to-list would be much easier to parse.
> 
> How that? You will tangle source block to several files, they content will
> be identical! Or you suggesting to add some syntax for source block
> indicating to which file to tangle that code snippet?
> 
> I would recommend you to describe your needs and how you do things right
> now.
> 
> [...]
> 
> > Best,
> > 
> >  Jacopo
> 
> ---
> WBR, Vladimir Lomov