Re: [wip-cite-new] Initial implementation of `csl' citation processor

[Nicolas Goaziou]

Hello,

Denis Maier <denismaier@mailbox.org> writes:

> I think a plain "p" in front of a number is not recognized as
> a locator prefix.
> Nicolas's post mentions "page", "p.", "pp." as valid locator terms for
> page. So in your case this here seems to apply: "The part of the
> suffix before the locator is appended to reference's prefix."

That's correct.

I updated the regexp matching locators to handle this case (and others).
So "p23" is now recognized (but not "p23-25" for example).

Regards,
-- 
Nicolas Goaziou