Re: Custom <<anchor>> possibility?

[Samuel Wales]

tahnk you.  that makes sense for validity.  still not sure about
uniqueness.  it's not needed for me to understand, though.
of course with across-export link stability then uniqueness would be meaningful.


On 5/21/21, Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Samuel Wales <samologist@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> so i am curious what the purpose of the default is?
>
> I think the purpose of the default value is to offer a solution that
> works for everyone. It is certainly not the best one in all situations.
>
> For example, I heard that even in 2021, using full Unicode in a URL is
> not good idea. Yet, some users may want to use Unicode symbols in
> a target.
>
> Regards,
> --
> Nicolas Goaziou
>


-- 
The Kafka Pandemic

Please learn what misopathy is.
https://thekafkapandemic.blogspot.com/2013/10/why-some-diseases-are-wronged.html