[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Moving some lisp/ob-*.el files to org-contrib - your advice?
From: |
Victor A. Stoichita |
Subject: |
Re: Moving some lisp/ob-*.el files to org-contrib - your advice? |
Date: |
Mon, 03 May 2021 22:52:23 +0200 |
Le 03 May 2021, Bastien <bzg@gnu.org> a écrit :
> I suggest a criterium for keeping ob*.el files in Org could be that
> the extension is known by Emacs _or_ that the supported language is
> well-established.
I happen to be an active user of ob-lilypond. Lilypond is certainly
peripheral to the world of programming languages. It is well established
and active as an equivalent of LaTeX for music though ([1][2][3]).
It comes with built-in support for Emacs [4].
I see no reason to not move ob-lilypond to org-contrib. I understand
that only few of us use it these days. I can’t stand up as a maintainer
since my Lisp skills and my knowledge of org-mode are quite insufficient
for that. I was happy to see that someone submitted a patch for
ob-lilypond in January. I hope that by the time something breaks I’ll be
able to submit a patch myself.
Regards,
Victor
[1] http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/
[2] https://music.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/lilypond
[3] https://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/lilypond
[4]
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.21/Documentation/usage/text-editor-support.html#emacs-mode
Re: Moving some lisp/ob-*.el files to org-contrib - your advice?,
Victor A. Stoichita <=
Re: Moving some lisp/ob-*.el files to org-contrib - your advice?, Bastien, 2021/05/04
Re: Moving some lisp/ob-*.el files to org-contrib - your advice?, Tim Cross, 2021/05/03
Re: Moving some lisp/ob-*.el files to org-contrib - your advice?, Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide, 2021/05/04
Re: Moving some lisp/ob-*.el files to org-contrib - your advice?, Jean Louis, 2021/05/06