[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: stability of toc links
From: |
Samuel Wales |
Subject: |
Re: stability of toc links |
Date: |
Thu, 29 Apr 2021 15:18:24 -0700 |
hi trs,
thank you. i can imagine that could be useful for a lot of users, but
for me, as i said in my op, "short of adding custom id
or id to everything" --- i didn't want to add custom id. i will try
to clarify why in case it is useful.
in addition to performance, and clutter, there is a semantic issue in
my case. typically, if i see that there is a properties drawer, i
know that it is there because of an org id or a manual custom id or a
special purpose of my own. if i know it, i don't need to open it.
however, adding custom id automatically for so many links means that
there is a new meaning for properties drawers [namely, for stable
linking done automatically]. i would have to open the drawer to
determine if i personally wanted something there.
and thus, the extra properties drawers would cause effort and
distraction in this semantic sense, where i would be opening them
because i would be thinking "did i really have a reason to add a
properties drawer here? i don't recall so... better check"
also, there is the issue that if i decide not to include something in
the toc, it will still have a properties drawer lying around.
in the op, i was not looking for a solution for one blog post, but
thought a general solution for all org users might be possible.
and this would likely be at the html level, probably by using e.g.
header text, fuzzy or strict hashes, or a combination.
when tec posted his html level code, it looked like the right type of
solution to the problem. i have not tried it, however.
i hope that clarifies. tec said he originally did not get much
interest. then there was interest on this thread. then nothing.
On 4/29/21, TRS-80 <lists.trs-80@isnotmyreal.name> wrote:
> On 2021-04-21 19:30, Samuel Wales wrote:
>> as it has been a long time my original post is
>>
>> Message
>> ID <CAJcAo8tXVW39h18FUXLtwoDYNKQsFHqCp+YDiyWfLee29B1PRw@mail.gmail.com>
>>
>> and the content is
>>
>> ===
>> when you link to a section using toc, you get a link like
>>
>>
>> https://thekafkapandemic.blogspot.com/2020/02/crimes-against-humanity_3.html#org080f0ab
>>
>> will these links break if somebody copies them and pastes them
>> elsewhere? what if you add a section?
>>
>> there doesn't seem to be a perfect solution, short of adding custom id
>> or id to everything, but perhaps a fuzzy hash of the header and
>> contents of the section could be used? or a strict hash of the
>> header? is anything like this being done? just curious.
>
> My "quick and dirty" solution was to make a function to map over each
> heading and assign a custom ID based on the text of the heading. It
> only assigned one if one did not exist already (so in case you had
> done any manual adjustments they would not be overwritten).
>
> I had posted it very early in the thread, but it did not seem to gain
> much interest. It was not posted as a "long term and proper solution
> to be included into Orgmode" but rather a quick and easy workaround in
> the meantime.
>
> Cheers,
> TRS-80
>
>
--
The Kafka Pandemic
Please learn what misopathy is.
https://thekafkapandemic.blogspot.com/2013/10/why-some-diseases-are-wronged.html
- Re: stability of toc links, (continued)
- Re: stability of toc links, Timothy, 2021/04/23
- Re: stability of toc links, Dominique Dumont, 2021/04/25
- Re: stability of toc links, Timothy, 2021/04/30
- Re: stability of toc links, Maxim Nikulin, 2021/04/30
- Re: stability of toc links, Samuel Wales, 2021/04/21
- Re: stability of toc links, Samuel Wales, 2021/04/21
- Re: stability of toc links, TRS-80, 2021/04/29
- Re: stability of toc links,
Samuel Wales <=
- Re: stability of toc links, TRS-80, 2021/04/29
- Re: stability of toc links, Tim Cross, 2021/04/30
- Re: stability of toc links, Samuel Loury, 2021/04/30
- Re: stability of toc links, Nicolas Goaziou, 2021/04/30
- Re: stability of toc links, Tim Cross, 2021/04/30
- Re: stability of toc links, Greg Minshall, 2021/04/30
Re: stability of toc links, Samuel Wales, 2021/04/18