[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Org as a book publisher
From: |
Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide |
Subject: |
Re: Org as a book publisher |
Date: |
Sun, 07 Mar 2021 18:46:44 +0100 |
User-agent: |
mu4e 1.4.15; emacs 27.1 |
Hi Juan,
I’ve been going that route for a few years now, and I setup an autotools
pipeline with all the little tweaks and hacks I needed to make
everything work well together.
I’m using LaTeX (pdflatex), scribus, calibre and imagemagick to publish
a roleplaying book with charactersheet,
Maybe some of it can help you. The entrypoints are the Makefile, the
setup, and the configure.ac (for the hacks):
https://hg.sr.ht/~arnebab/ews/browse/Hauptdokument/ews30/Makefile.am
https://hg.sr.ht/~arnebab/ews/browse/Hauptdokument/ews30/basesetup.tex
https://hg.sr.ht/~arnebab/ews/browse/Hauptdokument/ews30/ews30setup.tex
https://hg.sr.ht/~arnebab/ews/browse/Hauptdokument/ews30/ews30setup.el
https://hg.sr.ht/~arnebab/ews/browse/Hauptdokument/ews30/configure.ac
The main document is
https://hg.sr.ht/~arnebab/ews/browse/Hauptdokument/ews30/ews.org
I also have some derived documents that use the included tables as data.
Most complex example:
https://hg.sr.ht/~arnebab/ews/browse/Hauptdokument/ews30/chargen.org.in
Best wishes,
Arne
> Hi,
>
> I would like to share here two samples of one of the most intense uses
> that I give Org Mode: for typesetting, layout and editorial design. In
> other words, I use Org (and Org-Publish) where publishers today use DTP
> proprietary software like InDesign or QuarkXpress (a type of software,
> on the other hand, that was never intended to compose books but rather
> magazines, posters, brochures and so on). The samples are from a book
> on classical philology, recently published here in Spain, and from a
> fairly extensive dictionary, still work in progress:
>
> https://imgur.com/gallery/yxAVkrY
>
> Naturally, what acts in the background here is TeX and LaTeX
> (specifically Lua(La)TeX), so what I really do is use Org and
> Org-Publish as a sort of high-level interface for LaTeX. But I don't
> mean to avoid LaTeX: in fact, I've been working with LaTeX for a long
> time. I like LaTeX and behind these jobs there is a lot of LaTeX code.
> But Org gives me a much more light and productive workflow, allowing me
> to work at two levels.
>
> The main advantages that I see for this workflow with Org/Org-Publish
> are:
>
> 1. Lightness: LaTeX is too verbose.
> 2. Control of the composition process at various points. One of the
> qualities of LuaTeX is the possibility to control TeX primitives
> through scripts in Lua, and to act at various points in the pre- or
> post-process. But I have realized that with the happy fusion of Elisp
> and Org we can be much more precise and "surgical" ;-). Here,
> Org/LaTeX is much more powerful than LuaLaTeX.
> 3. Org's synaptic and org-anizational ability to control and manage the
> entire process of the creation of a book, from when the originals are
> received until everything is prepared to send to the printer.
> 4. An unique origin. The book can be produced on paper from a single
> source, but you can also export, from that source consistently, to
> other formats (HTML or Epub).
>
> Best regards,
>
> Juan Manuel
--
Unpolitisch sein
heißt politisch sein
ohne es zu merken
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature