Re: Using lexical-binding

[Kyle Meyer]

Kyle Meyer writes:

> Stefan Monnier writes:
>
>> Since I'm not using it, I can't really test the result in any meaningful
>> way.  Furthermore, just like `calendar.el`, it relies on dynamic scoping
>> and `eval` in all kinds of ways, so it's very difficult to be sure the
>> result is "sufficiently similar" to the old behavior not to break some
>> funky use somewhere out there.
>
> I probably don't use many fancy agenda features, but I do work regularly
> from it.  Running with these changes throughout today, I didn't notice
> any issues.  Within the next few days, I'll try to test some non-default
> settings and more obscure features that I don't use as part of my normal
> workflow, and see if I can find any problems.

I've continued to run with these changes and still haven't noticed any
problems.  I've also tested various features (sticky agendas, block
agendas, option setting from custom commands) and didn't spot anything.

> I'll also push the current changes to scratch/sm/agenda-lexical with the
> hope that others will test and report back.

Has anyone else tried this out?