[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [tip for EXWM users] An alternative method for isolate trees
From: |
Kyle Meyer |
Subject: |
Re: [tip for EXWM users] An alternative method for isolate trees |
Date: |
Tue, 02 Mar 2021 00:44:21 -0500 |
Julian M. Burgos writes:
> I have not noticed that org-tree-to-indirect-buffer
> reuses the indirect buffer when you call it for a second time.
> According to the manual, "with a C-u prefix, do not remove the
> previously used indirect buffer", but that does not seem to work.
> When you do Cu-Cc-Cx-b from a buffer that already has an indirect
> buffer you get a "cannot modify an area being edited in a dedicated
> buffer". If you try it from a different buffer, the prefix is ignored
> and the indirect buffer is assigned to the tree from the last buffer.
Hmm, could you provide a reproducer for the problem? Here's what I
tried with the current master (afd75d05a), Emacs 27.1, and no custom
configuration.
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
* a
a content
* b
b content
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
- on "a", C-c C-x b ;; org-tree-to-indirect-buffer
Displays <file>-a-1 buffer.
- move to "b", C-u C-c C-x b
Displays <file>-b-1 buffer, a-1 buffer still exists.